SFSC and families with young children
Evidence of reach and impact

This page sets out the evidence base for the Strengthening Families, Strengthening Communities (SFSC) programme with parents and carers of children aged 0–5. It draws on two years of published delivery data from a Start for Life commission, a Lancet-published Randomised Controlled Trial, and over two decades of independent evaluation. It is intended for funders, commissioners, and partners seeking to understand our early years work.

Reaching families with young children

SFSC has always been a programme for families across the full span of childhood: from pregnancy and the earliest months of a child’s life through to young people reaching adulthood. The curriculum is structured to be developmentally appropriate at every stage, with content, strategies, and facilitated discussion that reflect the specific realities of parenting a very young child, a primary-age child, or a teenager. Facilitators are trained to draw out the material most relevant to the parents in the room, which in practice means that early years content — attachment, early communication, managing toddler behaviour, preparing for school — is a central part of most SFSC groups.

SFSC was a core part of the Sure Start programme from its earliest years, delivered regularly in Sure Start children’s centres across England. It remains a significant part of the service offer in early years settings, family hubs, and children’s centres across the country, and is included in the DfE’s Menu of Evidence-Based Parenting Interventions for Family Hubs and Start for Life.

Barking and Dagenham Start for Life — a published example

Our work in the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (LBBD) illustrates what this looks like in practice when SFSC is commissioned specifically as an early years programme. Since 2023, Race Equality Foundation has delivered SFSC there under a specific commission from the local authority as part of its Start for Life programme. Having at least one child under five, or being pregnant, was a condition of referral onto the programme.

Across two years of delivery (2023–25), the programme reached 148 parents and carers across ten programmes, delivered in children’s centres, family hubs, faith spaces, and community settings. The cohort was highly diverse in ethnicity, language, and socioeconomic background.

 

Who We Reached — 2023–25 Combined

The largest ethnic groups were Bangladeshi, African, and Indian. Over half of participants reported household incomes below £20,000. More than half did not speak English as a first language. Participants were referred primarily through health visitors, GPs, and early years settings — consistent with Start for Life commissioning intent.

Recorded child age data shows that at least 88% of participants in 2024–25 had at least one child under five, with 47.5% caring exclusively for children in the 0–5 age group. Where child age was not recorded on forms, this reflects incomplete data submission rather than participants without young children, given the under-five referral criterion. In Year One (2023–24), almost all participants had a child aged 0–2.

Referral routes into the programme are consistent with early years commissioning. In 2024–25 the most common pathways were schools and early years settings (33 participants) and health professionals including health visitors and GPs (21 participants).

 

Published Source

Full cohort profile and referral pathway data is available in our published impact reports for both years of the Start for Life commission. See links below.

What our data shows: parenting change in an early years cohort

Race Equality Foundation collects demographic information and matched pre- and post-programme questionnaires from participants as a matter of course across all SFSC delivery. This is standard practice. The Barking and Dagenham cohort is presented here as an illustration of our data practice with this age group but this level of data collection reflects how REF routinely captures and reports on reach and impact wherever SFSC is delivered.

Across both years of the Start for Life commission, participants completed these standard pre- and post-programme questionnaires measuring change across parenting behaviours, emotional regulation, and understanding of child development. The data below is drawn from the 54 participants who completed both questionnaires in 2024–25, in a cohort where the substantial majority were parents or carers of children under five.

Parenting indicator Before After
Parents who always show love and affection to their child 70% 83%
Parents who always praise or encourage their child for good behaviour 65% 72%
Parents who always handle upset calmly 35% 54%
Parents who always think about how their child feels before acting 32% 54%
Parents who always help their child solve problems 46% 65%
Parents who understand the impact of their parenting on their child’s development 54% 76%
Parents who always lose their temper when disciplining their child (lower is better) 9% 2%
Parents who always show love and affection to their child
Before 70%  →  After 83%
Parents who always praise or encourage their child for good behaviour
Before 65%  →  After 72%
Parents who always handle upset calmly
Before 35%  →  After 54%
Parents who always think about how their child feels before acting
Before 32%  →  After 54%
Parents who always help their child solve problems
Before 46%  →  After 65%
Parents who understand the impact of their parenting on their child’s development
Before 54%  →  After 76%
Parents who always lose their temper when disciplining their child
Before 9%  →  After 2%

Methodological Note

These figures are drawn from pre- and post-programme self-report questionnaires. The evaluation cannot claim causation, and some variation may reflect participants recalibrating their self-assessment as their knowledge grows during the programme. The consistency of direction and scale across both years of delivery and across all ethnic groups represented provides a reasonable basis for confidence in the pattern of findings. Full data tables are available in the published impact reports linked above.

In Year One (2023–24), the programme showed particular impact in supporting parents to reduce reliance on verbal and physical approaches to discipline. Parents also reported significant improvements in confidence to manage disruptive behaviour, manage their own anger, and express their emotions effectively; parenting capacities directly relevant to the early years.

The broader published evidence base

The LBBD delivery data above sits within a wider published evidence base built over more than two decades. The following sources are independently produced, publicly available, and collectively establish SFSC’s programme fidelity, effectiveness with minoritised communities, and relevance across the early years age range.

A Note on Evidence and Minoritised Communities

Programmes with the strongest published, age-disaggregated evidence on 0–5 outcomes tend to have been developed for and tested on majority-population samples, with minoritised communities underrepresented or treated as a subgroup. SFSC is distinctive in having a Lancet-published RCT conducted specifically with a majority-minoritised sample, combined with two decades of independent evaluation. The LBBD data represents some of the only published pre/post outcome data for an SFSC cohort specifically commissioned for families with children under five in a highly diverse borough.

Online SFSC: a programme designed around your child’s age

The LBBD delivery data above sits within a wider published evidence base built over more than two decades. The following sources are independently produced, publicly available, and collectively establish SFSC’s programme fidelity, effectiveness with minoritised communities, and relevance across the early years age range.

External recognition and programme listings

SFSC is independently recognised as an evidence-based programme by several national bodies, confirming its fidelity to established early childhood development frameworks.